User talk:KG4SGP

Welcome to Wikinews

Getting started as a contributor How to write an article Pick something current? Use two independent sources? Read your sources before writing the story in your own words?. Do choose a unique title? before you start. Follow Wikinews' structure? for articles, answering as many of who what when where why and how? as you can; summarised in a short, two- or three-sentence opening paragraph. Once complete, your article must be three or more paragraphs. If you need help, you can add {{helpme}} to your talkpage, along with a question, or alternatively, just ask? Use this tab to enter your title and get a basic article template. [RECOMMENDED. Starts your article through the semi-automated {{develop}}—>{{review}}—>{{publish}} collaboration process.]

Welcome, KG4SGP! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have an essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally. As you get more involved, you will need to look into key project policies and other discussions you can participate in; so, keep this message on this page and refer to the other links in it when you want to learn more, or have any problems. Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation   Used to contributing to Wikipedia? See here.

All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours. Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere. The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing. Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly.

The core policies Neutral point of view Cite sources Writing an article Content guide Style guide Reviewing articles

Places to go, people to meet Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion. There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project.

Find help and get involved The Water Cooler The Latest News The Newsroom Articles for deletion Audio Wikinews Recent Changes

Write your first article for Wikinews! Use the following box to help you create your first article. Simply type in a title to your story and press "Create page". Then start typing text to your story into the new box that will come up. When you're done, press "save page". That's all there is to it! It is recommended you read the article guide before starting. Also make sure to check the list of recently created articles to see if your story hasn't already been reported upon.

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 00:57, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Israel sets 36 hour ultimatum for Hamas

Hi! Published, congratulations and thanks. Seems a very solid piece of work. A few things here and there. See the review comments, and history of edits during review. --Pi zero (talk) 16:16, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Hey, and thanks! I really appreciate the encouragement! Hopefully as I get more into things I may be able to really streamline the reviewers process. It's got to get annoying when there's a lot of fact checking multiple sources with no idea where the fact is in the sources. Yeah I usually go back and see what the reviewers changed/edited.

Thanks again! KG4SGP (talk) 02:27, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Agencies choose yearlong crew for International Space Station

Although I did pass this, the sourcing was pretty weak; it was close to being an echo of the press release. The Huffington Post source wasn't even drawn on for any information that wasn't in the press release; its only small contribution was to demonstration of newsworthiness. Preferably, although it'd be fine to use the press release as one source, one would also have a couple of mutually independent sources besides the press release, and would draw from each of them some info not in the press release.

Nice use of html comments, btw. :-)  --Pi zero (talk) 14:47, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll keep the above in mind on future articles. I've tended to write short articles that mainly discuss the big points, and most of those were in the press release, but I probably should have gone into more fine detail and will in the future. Thanks for publishing!

KG4SGP (talk) 16:12, 27 November 2012 (UTC)