User talk:Marcus Qwertyus

Welcome to Wikinews

Getting started as a contributor How to write an article Pick something current? Use two independent sources? Read your sources before writing the story in your own words?. Do choose a unique title? before you start. Follow Wikinews' structure? for articles, answering as many of who what when where why and how? as you can; summarised in a short, two- or three-sentence opening paragraph. Once complete, your article must be three or more paragraphs. If you need help, you can add {{helpme}} to your talkpage, along with a question, or alternatively, just ask? Use this tab to enter your title and get a basic article template. [RECOMMENDED. Starts your article through the semi-automated {{develop}}—>{{review}}—>{{publish}} collaboration process.]

Welcome! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have an essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally. As you get more involved, you will need to look into key project policies and other discussions you can participate in; so, keep this message on this page and refer to the other links in it when you want to learn more, or have any problems. Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation   Used to contributing to Wikipedia? See here.

All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours. Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere. The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing. Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly.

The core policies Neutral point of view Cite sources Writing an article Content guide Style guide Reviewing articles

Places to go, people to meet Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion. There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project.

Find help and get involved The Water Cooler The Latest News The Newsroom Articles for deletion Audio Wikinews Recent Changes

Write your first article for Wikinews! Use the following box to help you create your first article. Simply type in a title to your story and press "Create page". Then start typing text to your story into the new box that will come up. When you're done, press "save page". That's all there is to it! It is recommended you read the article guide before starting. Also make sure to check the list of recently created articles to see if your story hasn't already been reported upon.

Edit summaries

Please use them. --theMONO 00:11, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

I should point out that they are entirely optional; you don't have to use them if you wish. — μ 00:32, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

I'll probably make them brief to reduce edit conflicts. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 00:37, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

They're really helpful for edits like this, where the diff shows nothing. --theMONO 00:51, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Re the first edit summary

Attribute? Did this come from Wikipedia? If so, it's copyvio; the CC-BY-SA 3.0 is not backwards compatible with the CC-BY-2.5 (you can copy stuff from here to enwiki legally, but not from enwiki to here). Also, it's preferred if attribution is, like, immediate ... so people like me know where the content came from. —fetch·comms 04:52, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

It's all from the last Wikinews article, most of which I intend to rewrite. Do you know where the guidelines for Wikinews attribution are? Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 05:04, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Hmm, that's odd—why is the article using ref tags? Anyway, I don't know of any guideline for attribution, I just follow the license, which says you have to attribute the author(s) (for other WN content after September 25, 2005, that is). WN:C might cover what you're looking for. —fetch·comms 05:10, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

I copy pasted some content with the full intention of rewriting to avoid the mundane task of typing it all out. Obviously some fragments are still not fully original to Wikinews. That I intend to fix. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 05:21, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

wikinews: A record of what was known at the time

I have reverted your rename of the Japanese quake story, per policy.

Wikinews articles serve as a record of what was known at the time, not as a constantly revised piece.

The article in question is now two days old; substantial changes, particularly a rename, should not be done. With the quake being upgraded, this is new information which came to light after publication; it should go in a new article. The existing article can then be cited under Related news and drawn from as a source. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 09:14, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

My opinion probably carries no weight here but articles should probably be allowed to refresh if the event is 2-3 days old. Articles can take days to review whereas a simple update is instantly available. Wikinews just isn't one of those news organizations that can afford to constantly reprint material. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 12:10, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

• Your opinion is contrary to policy. The policy exists for a good reason, and once an article is reviewed and published it is pushed to Google News - they spider and cache it. You should, per policy, never add information dated later than the publication date of an article. Insead, a new article should be created. In this instance, it would be relatively simple to have created Japanese quake upgraded to 9.0 magnitude. 80% of the content could have been drawn from the other articles written on site so-far, thus making reviewing simple. Instead, you made a link on the main page point to a redirect page; and, had your change been sighted, would have had two entries for the same story, under conflicting headlines, pushed to Google News.

Please bear in mind this is not Wikipedia. Articles being a record of what was known at the time is a very important part of the project mission. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 14:32, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Template:breaking news shouldn't really exist then or should be modified. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 20:24, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

The breaking template should be removed immediately 24 hours after publication; in fact that ought to be made to happen automatically. --Pi zero (talk) 00:38, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi Marcus Qwertyus! Just about the sentence "..Apple additionally introduced a magnetic 'Smart Cover' accessory that snaps to the front screen.." in the article "iPad 2 goes on sale in United States" . What do you mean with the verb "snaps" in this context? Thanks a lot in advance Marcus Qwertys!82.53.17.44 (talk) 08:26, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

It quite literally 'snaps' into place. Here is a short clip. I question whether the magnets will be strong enough though. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 08:51, 18 March 2011 (UTC)