User talk:Rvplpr

Welcome to Wikinews

Getting started as a contributor How to write an article Pick something current? Use two independent sources? Read your sources before writing the story in your own words?. Do choose a unique title? before you start. Follow Wikinews' structure? for articles, answering as many of who what when where why and how? as you can; summarised in a short, two- or three-sentence opening paragraph. Once complete, your article must be three or more paragraphs. If you need help, you can add {{helpme}} to your talkpage, along with a question, or alternatively, just ask? Use this tab to enter your title and get a basic article template. [RECOMMENDED. Starts your article through the semi-automated {{develop}}—>{{review}}—>{{publish}} collaboration process.]

Welcome! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have an essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally. As you get more involved, you will need to look into key project policies and other discussions you can participate in; so, keep this message on this page and refer to the other links in it when you want to learn more, or have any problems. Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation   Used to contributing to Wikipedia? See here.

All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours. Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere. The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing. Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly.

The core policies Neutral point of view Cite sources Writing an article Content guide Style guide Reviewing articles

Places to go, people to meet Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion. There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project.

Find help and get involved The Water Cooler The Latest News The Newsroom Articles for deletion Audio Wikinews Recent Changes

Write your first article for Wikinews! Use the following box to help you create your first article. Simply type in a title to your story and press "Create page". Then start typing text to your story into the new box that will come up. When you're done, press "save page". That's all there is to it! It is recommended you read the article guide before starting. Also make sure to check the list of recently created articles to see if your story hasn't already been reported upon.

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 04:32, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your contributions

Hi. You might find WN:PILLARS useful for a sense of how en.wn works. Then, there's lots of useful information in the {{Howdy}} template at the top of this page. --Pi zero (talk) 16:50, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

COI

It seems likely you may have a conflict of interest in writing about Cary Lee Peterson. Any such thing should be disclosed. Whether it's severe enough to prevent you from writing on the topic, remains to be seen. --Pi zero (talk) 23:33, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

RVPlus Inc PR account

I have started a discussion to have this id (Rvplpr (talk · contribs)) permanently banned as a promotional, single-purpose account.

Wikinews does not exist to serve your PR purposes, or to pump up the reputation of SEC-suspended 'junk' or worthless penny stocks.

You should never assume that because a site says "Wiki" you'll be able to game it as part of deceiving people and make false claims regarding zombie businesses that haven't turned over a red cent in the past few years. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 14:06, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

[Brian] I'm sure there others reviewing this will identify that your comments are quite libelous. Your references above are in reference to a 10-day stock trading suspension that was a year ago for a company that has absolutely nothing to do with the original article written or the content of the article. I wrote an article about humanitarian acts in world government. Not anywhere in the article or articles that were used as references of anything linked to the articles mentioned in the reference pertain to stocks or Wall Streets as Brian McNeil has used in attempt to defame the individual referenced in the article and gain supporters do delete my article. It appears Brian McNeil has had a history of this type of behavior on Wikiworld as I've discovered from past content dispute. Some quarrels were apparent and others marginal. Fact is that Brian failed to read the content or follow up with the references before making a public comment on the matter, which is not acceptable coming from an administrator, who is supposed to be reviewing content thoroughly and without bias or prejudice.

[ Admin@Wikinews ] If you see the hyperlink to the the Wiki discussion/dispute below you will see that Brian's comments were not accurate and hold extreme bias and prejudice. He's made more than one comment and rebuttal that led me to this response now. I have utmost respect for Wikiworld admin but I also know when someone is blatantly attempting to cut me down or insult me and is not paying close attention.

McNeil's actions are very questionable to whether or not he's capable of making concise decision for Wikiworld. I am a student. Sure I have volunteered for the organization I writing news about. The sources are bonafied. Yahoo News, Reuters, UN.ORG. All legitimate sources. McNeil attempts to bypass these facts and rebuttals with slanderous comments and link to a press release talking about a stock tip from over a year ago that had nothing to do with the article that I wrote about a delegate's statement and meeting at the United Nations last month. Rvplpr (talk) 17:35, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

• Let me go ask Wikinews' in-house paralegal; but, first, I should point out that the correct word you should be using is defamation. You, personally, would have to drop your anonymity and demonstrate a reputation which had incurred actual damage. That would be through proving my statements were made with the intent to cause said damage, and that such statements were made with reckless disregard for the facts of the matter.

At the moment, with nothing published on Wikinews, you have zero reputation to defend. Your 'attempted' contribution history supports the allegations I have made, not your claim of 'Godly innocence'.

There's nothing questionable about my decisions here. Yahoo will publish any old crap that press-release pushers labeling themselves as a 'wire service' send them; that does not make such drivel news, no matter how many of these puff pieces you try gluing together. And, Reuters? Would that be this puff piece? The one with the disclaimer: "Reuters is not responsible for the content in this press release"? Even the too-trusting United Nations don't list the Academy of Universal Global Peace as an academic institution; thus calling into-question their ability to issue any sort of degree, honorary or otherwise. That, similarly, gives an opportunity to have another guess at your identity: "Rahul Decosta", No?

In any case, I'm sure the project admins find your appeal highly-amusing. It's extremely unlikely to generate any sympathy, since we promote people to admin for critical thinking and judgment skills. Your "works" have already been used to conclude " it's no longer tenable to suppose they're anything other than a PR instrument". Plus, that your latest attempt to promote Cary Lee Peterson should be deleted.

I'm not a project administrator, but I could have banned you since I am a bureaucrat — a role with all the privileges of admin, and then some. The responsibility that comes with the extra privileges is protecting the project from timewasters and propagandists like yourself. You've wasted reviewer time over a period of months, and done nothing but attempt to create a positive spin on some character who has — somehow — ingratiated themselves with the UN.

By all means, keep complaining that I'm not nice. You've worn-out the welcome mat, and absolved me of any obligation to sugar-coat criticism. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 09:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Sorry Brian, it appears you lost me, all of the reviewers and admin who are now onto this matter. What does your long- winded response of gibberish (which seems to reveal an apparent self-generated hatred towards a man and group of organizations publicized their mission of goodwill for the world) have to do with the validity of my article source from the UN statement (from un.org) published in the Yahoo News articles referenced?

Through all of your attempts to defame and slander someone's character, broadcast your own form of propaganda (about stocks and whether or not Reuters news articles are credible or not), threaten me, and then altering the hyperlink from my original response to the Wiki Talk page (displaying the proofs to my argument and the feeble minded notion of yours), what exactly have you accomplished here?

Now that you've openly admitted that as an administrator you reserve the right to bully and manipulate your appointed authority, I assume its time to address the matter at hand with the (wiki) board and remove any rubbish that one particular moderator has taken into his own hands, thus, has abused his privileges from authority. Its apparent you cannot handle your role and to imply that content from anyone delegating at United Nations is a joke, fraud, or in whatever way not news worthy is quite unacceptable. I do not think the several people who have dedicated their lives to philanthropy, humanity, and world diplomacy would find your comments or demeanor flattering. I think you've made your own bed mister. Good Day.

NOTE: Shall I talk a screen shot again in case you attempt to alter my original message (again), which confirmed the validity of the source from the UN statement published in Yahoo News articles referenced and confirming your various defamatory invalid and irrelevant to your initial reason for trying to ban a basic three paragraph article about a delegate speaking at the United Nations?

Rvplpr (talk) 10:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

??

Did you ever take this matter before the Arbitration Committee? Personally, I think you're just another PR hack, but I could be wrong. Brian McNeil has a pretty smart head about such things. Have you re-engaged here recently? Do you wish to engage in citizen journalism? --Bddpaux (talk) 02:35, 28 October 2014 (UTC)