Wikinews:Accreditation requests/Gthuman123
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Four different Wikinewsies speak with one voice, here; try writing some news and we'll roll from there. Yet, this user's only edits have been to seek accreditation. Months have passed. Drawing this out any longer would be a waste of time. BRS (Talk) (Contribs) 04:25, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Gthuman123 (talk)
[edit]- Name: P H Doyle
- Location: Topeka, Kansas, United States
- Areas of interest: Engineering, Busniess, Government
- Reason: Inverviews
- Accomplishments: Doyle v Transunion
- Contact information: Patrick_h_doyle@yahoo.com
- User ID: Gthuman123
- Applied on: 16:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- Getting accreditation is something of a 'big deal', and I don't think 2 edits would do. Leaderboard (talk) 16:45, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, there honestly isn't a basis here to support accreditation; no content edits here, no activity at all anywhere else on the sisterhood. We're certainly interested to help out a newcomer to Wikinews (just, accreditation isn't appropriate at this stage). --Pi zero (talk) 23:45, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello Gthuman123! Thanks for applying for accreditation. What interviews would you like to do? --Gryllida (talk) 22:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Response to Gryllida: Election issues currently. Banking in the near future.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gthuman123 (talk • contribs)
- Well, the best way for you, @Gthuman123: would be to start writing regularly--the best way to learn about the project policies and philosophies, as well as to earn the reputation that one needs to get to any higher post. On a side note, as why this request is self-explanatory for why a lot of work is to be done: things should be understood by global audience; and "Topeka, KS" highlights that point. (Who was that veteran Wikinewsie who would say, "You are not in Kansas anymore"?)
103.254.128.86 (talk) 15:50, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hidden category: