Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Diego Grez 5

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Unanimous support; noting there's no set time to run these for I see little point dragging it out any longer. Congratulations, and welcome to the team! Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 19:27, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diego Grez (talk · contribs)

Diego - who has accepted this nom via IRC - has, I believe, been working hard and to a high standard for quite some time now. He's had a few noms in the past, but the time has now come where I'm delighted to nom this user for the mop. We all trust Diego by now. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 17:51, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Diego Grez (talk · contribs) will need to post below, here, to accept the nomination, onwiki. -- Cirt (talk) 19:05, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I accept ;-) --Diego Grez ^{return fire} 19:07, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Question - Your contributions to Wikinews have been positive and the community respects and appreciates your work on this project. However, can you please explain your Block log on English Wikipedia ? Thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 19:07, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not something I like to remember. My early months on Wikipedia were really problematic, not only there but on es.wiki. I behaved very childishly, and I ended annoying the admins on Wikipedia. I think I have matured enough, not only here on Wikinews, that has been my real home on Wikimedia, but on my real life. For a reason I'm not blocked anymore on the English Wikipedia ;-) (Don't ask me about Spanish Wikipedia, they still hate me <.<). Diego Grez ^{return fire} 19:12, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also, note that the very same person who blocked me for ten years on Wikipedia nominated me for adminship here. --Diego Grez ^{return fire} 19:16, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you for the response. -- Cirt (talk) 19:39, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed; and, in my capacity as enwp blocking admin, I supported Diego's request to have the block lifted. I'm happy to admit I kept a close eye on Diego when he arrived on enwn after that block, but it quickly became clear that wasn't needed. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 20:54, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Support as nom Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 17:51, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think he's definitely waited long enough. Bawolff ☺☻ 17:54, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trustworthy user, very much admired his Chile earthquake reports and photos, and more recently his dispatches on the 200th bicentennial of the country. Certainly worthy of the mop. Wackywace^dictaphone 17:56, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pi zero (talk) 19:57, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trusted, experienced user. Tyrol5 (talk) 23:02, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Mike moral ♪♫ 23:05, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support red-thunder. 23:58, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - If all the work Diego has put in doesn't prove by now that he's changed, I'll eat my hat. As good as passed :) BarkingFish (talk) 20:46, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Should do well. Pmlineditor ^discuss 08:18, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Now seems like a good time. —fetch·comms 02:48, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm fairly confident he'll do a good job and be useful around the place. Bencherlite (talk) 10:31, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
SupportNo concerns here --Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 13:41, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support due to real effort to fit in and understand project needs. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 05:56, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support He has been ready for a month or two. I am glad he accepted the nom. --InfantGorilla (talk) 20:47, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.