Jump to content

Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Bureaucrat/Blood Red Sandman

Add links
From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!


The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



Blood Red Sandman

[edit]

7 days having passed since this nomination, and there being no objections to completion of the process nor the nominated party, I confirm that this nomination for bureaucratship is passed by 12/0/0. BarkingFish (talk) 20:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Welcome to the team! --Skenmy talk 20:27, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Express your view on this user Nominated on 08:30, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs – Edit rights) – Several bureaucrats have quite low levels of activity at the moment, so I feel it will be valuable to have an experienced and level-headed administrator, writer, editor (and former arbitrator) added to the roster. This should reduce the number of times we need to turn to stewards for renames, or wait for bot flags. Naturally I also trust him to award/revoke admin flags in the best interests of news gathering. InfantGorilla (talk) 08:30, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination:I accept. Many thanks, IG. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 17:21, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

General comments

[edit]
RfBs for this user:

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting. Unhelpful comments or votes may be removed at any time.

Discussion

[edit]
Support
[edit]
  1. InfantGorilla (talk) 08:33, 28 September 2010 (UTC) as nom[reply]
  2. He might breath fire on occasions but I trust him to judge consensus when flipping flags --Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 10:06, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Dmitri and Gorilla make good points --RockerballAustralia c 10:11, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Blood Red will be a great asset to our community as a 'crat. red-thunder.
  5. Sure. --Diego Grez return fire 17:26, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Wackywacedictaphone 17:40, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Pi zero (talk) 19:31, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tyrol5 (talk) 19:32, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support. Yes. -- Cirt (talk) 02:15, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support trusted. Bawolff ☺☻ 11:22, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support I thought you already were a 'crat. —Mikemoral♪♫ 23:13, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Blood Red Support --Brian McNeil / talk 06:00, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
[edit]
Neutral
[edit]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Wikinews:Requests_for_permissions/Bureaucrat/Blood_Red_Sandman&oldid=1107507"