Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Oversight/Bawolff
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.
We need at least 2 OS's, preferably more (should one not pass the election, or need to step down). Bawolff is possibly one of the most chilled, laid back, and least drama involved people on Wikinews I know. As such, I think he'd make an excellent Oversight. Plus, as an added bonus, we'd have more people for Tempo to haras should something need Orbital Striking. He, like everyone else up for vote, is a crat, and was also a previous ArbCom. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 23:22, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]- Sure why not. :). Bawolff ☺☻ 23:23, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Question what personal qualities do you believe you have which make you suitable for the role of oversighter? --Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 18:06, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I like to think I am level headed and all that. (Of course when evaluating myself I have a conflict of interest). Bawolff ☺☻ 02:41, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Votes
[edit]Support
[edit]- Support as om nom nom --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 23:22, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support because I love the ñam ñam ñam. I trust Bawolff. --Diego Grez return fire 23:23, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support —fetch·comms 23:23, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Sure. I trust bawolff, if he's willing to identify to the foundation, why not. Tempodivalse [talk] 23:24, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support —Mikemoral♪♫ 23:28, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support — Gopher65talk 01:25, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Pi zero (talk) 02:46, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, trustworthy. Blurpeace 04:30, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Skenmy talk 07:57, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --KTo288 (talk) 10:00, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. -- Cirt (talk) 11:17, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support — μ 13:04, June 7 2010 (UTC)
- Support Δενδοδγε τ\c 15:24, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- .... Bawolff ☺☻ 02:41, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that if this RFP passes, a steward might look at this vote in a state of massive confusion... Benny the mascot (talk) 03:03, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Vote stricken as ambiguous. Please clarify. Benny the mascot (talk) 01:29, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I was being naughty. It's a support. I wondered whether anybody would notice. Δενδοδγε τ\c 10:08, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Vote stricken as ambiguous. Please clarify. Benny the mascot (talk) 01:29, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that if this RFP passes, a steward might look at this vote in a state of massive confusion... Benny the mascot (talk) 03:03, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- .... Bawolff ☺☻ 02:41, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Of course Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 11:27, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Pmlineditor discuss 12:31, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Blurpeace 02:16, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]- This user voted twice. :-/ Benny the mascot (talk) 02:56, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Clearly this is because I'm double trustworthy. Bawolff ☺☻ 03:17, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- lolself-esteem ;) --Diego Grez return fire 03:20, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Clearly this is because I'm double trustworthy. Bawolff ☺☻ 03:17, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This user voted twice. :-/ Benny the mascot (talk) 02:56, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- very strong support. As two people are required to man the Memory Hole Management Team, I have to pick Bawolff as the second, because I know I can get hold of him within a reasonable timeframe. --Brian McNeil / talk 12:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Loves huge tools Killing Vector (talk) 18:14, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --PatrickFlaherty (talk) 18:42, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I trust bawolff with this job. Cary Bass (talk) 18:52, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Jacques Divol (talk) 19:03, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Calebrw (talk) 20:23, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Unconditionally Support. --Thunderhead (t - e - c) 20:42, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support--Cspurrier (talk) 00:36, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Turtlestack (talk) 06:14, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support ABF (talk) 09:29, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 07:22, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
[edit]Abstain
[edit]- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.