Comments:US state of Florida assumes control of Disney World's self-governing district
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.
Contents
Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
---|---|---|
Parental rights in education Bill | 4 | 11:55, 22 June 2023 |
"DeSantis and Disney clashed last year over the company's opposition to the Florida Parental Rights in Education Act. Called "Don’t Say Gay" by its opponents, the law forbade schools from teaching kindergarten to third grade students about gender identity and sexuality." - what did DeSantis and Disney wish, which side they took? And did the bill pass? Why is it called 'parental rights' if it is more about schools' rights?
DeSantis was for the bill; I figured saying "law" was a quicker way of communicating it passed; DeSantis' argument was that the law "protected parents' rights" by "safeguarding" their children from schools. Funny, I agree with the move to give the state more oversight over Disney-corporations shouldn't be ruling themselves-but certainly not why he did it. This is suppression of free speech.
Suppression of Disney's right, as an individual-since corporations are considered legal persons in the US, to free speech. If a corporation is not allowed that right, is it likely that DeSantis would advocate a human individual's right to do the same? Furthermore, it contravenes Citizens United, which, when it's corporations spending in elections without restriction to Republicans' benefit, they like.
Tangentially related -- https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-03-07/chatgpt-alter-ego-dan-ignores-ethics-in-ai-program/102052338 is interesting, general question like 'should kids be taught unethical things' or 'should general public have access to information how to do unethical things' etc