Talk:Fallen power cable kills 26 in Congo-Kinshasa

Note to reviewer

The reason I used "Congo-Kinshasa" in the title is that it is an oft-used way to refer to Democratic Republic of the Congo and easy way to distinguish from Republic of the Congo. Cheers, --SVTCobra 02:00, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Why are the BBC and NBC articles the same link? --JJLiu112 (talk) 17:02, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

@JJLiu112@SVTCobra, I have changed the links. I hope SVTCobra doesn't mind! 2006nishan178713^t@lk 17:34, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

1) Thank you for fixing the url, it was a copy/paste mistake. 2) We have always put newswires such as AFP, Reuters or AP in the author field for as long as I remember. Here is one example. If such a piece also has a human name attached to it we would put it like "John Doe, AP". Has something changed regarding this practice? Cheers, --SVTCobra 18:48, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Last time when I used author names like AFP or Reuters, i guess Acagastya or Cromium removed it. I am not 100% sure if any policy has changed. Good night! It's cold and windy here :) 2006nishan178713^t@lk 19:11, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

@2006nishan178713 There is a difference between mentioning syndicate as author, vs putting the name of publisher as author. •–• 20:43, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Got it 2006nishan178713^t@lk 11:46, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Review of revision 4660023 [Passed]

Revision 4660023 of this article has been reviewed by Cromium (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:10, 4 February 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Small amount of copy editing done. No significant issues found. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4660023 of this article has been reviewed by Cromium (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:10, 4 February 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Small amount of copy editing done. No significant issues found. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.