Talk:New Zealand mosque murder suspect appears in court at Christchurch

Date

There appears to be a bit of confusion with the date of the incident, from sources I think it's on Friday but one of the sources is dated the 14th. I think this is because it is in another part of the globe. Gryllida (talk) 11:15, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Barton

I added that Greg Barton is a counter-terrorism expert. I couldn't tell if he was an expert or a witness. Darkfrog24 (talk) 15:42, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Review of revision 4471079 [Passed]

Revision 4471079 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The Daily Mail is highly suspect; I'd recommend avoiding it altogether. In this case, it looks likely to have gotten the names of the two mosques a bit garbled (and there was something else from it I was also suspicious of; don't recall just what it was now, though I did double-check whatever-it-was). The first created version of the page had a badly garbled date (had to be completely related) and was missing its {{haveyoursay}}. Seems likely to have been automation-gone-wrong. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4471079 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The Daily Mail is highly suspect; I'd recommend avoiding it altogether. In this case, it looks likely to have gotten the names of the two mosques a bit garbled (and there was something else from it I was also suspicious of; don't recall just what it was now, though I did double-check whatever-it-was). The first created version of the page had a badly garbled date (had to be completely related) and was missing its {{haveyoursay}}. Seems likely to have been automation-gone-wrong. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.