Talk:Russia asks Facebook to comply with personal data policy

Translations

Hello everyone,

I am sorry, I had a lot of tasks this week and could not reply sooner. (When asking me to translate things on live chat or by email, it is very helpful to include the quotes into your message directly rather than linking me to two websites to visit. This may speed up the response a lot.)

> "The law is mandatory for everyone. In any case, we will make sure the law is carried out, or else the company will stop working in Russia, as regretfully happened to Linkedin. No exceptions will be made" ((ru)) . > "Закон обязателен для всех. В любом случае мы или добьемся того, чтобы закон был исполнен, или компания прекратит работать на территории Российской Федерации, как, к сожалению, произошло с LinkedIn. Тут исключений нет",

The last sentence is "There are no exceptions here", not "No exceptions will be made". Although the meaning is very similar, the former is more accurate.

> "We don't have Facebook in our 2017 inspections schedule. In 2018 we will think about it and maybe we will launch an inspection." > "У нас в плане проверок по этому направлению до конца 2017 года Facebook'a нет, в 2018 году мы подумаем, может быть, проверим"

It would be nice to add "We don't have Facebook in our 2017 inspections schedule in this direction". ("по этому направлению"). Apart from that the translation is correct.

--Gryllida (talk, chat) 22:19, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Sourcing

Kyiv Post paywalls the article for me; I can see the first two paragraphs and the first line of the third. Haven't decided yet how to handle that; it's certainly too late for a not-ready to have any chance of being addressed without also refreshing the article. --Pi zero (talk) 20:50, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Review of revision 4351085 [Passed]

Revision 4351085 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Although I could see just two paragraphs at the start of the paywalled Kyiv Post source, I did not use anything from them during the review. I removed the source from the list, which isn't an ideal solution either (but I don't think there are any ideal solutions for this case). This did not seem to me a terribly high-profile story in the msm here in the US, so I feel its freshness hasn't altogether leached away ahead of the end-of-third-day horizon. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4351085 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Although I could see just two paragraphs at the start of the paywalled Kyiv Post source, I did not use anything from them during the review. I removed the source from the list, which isn't an ideal solution either (but I don't think there are any ideal solutions for this case). This did not seem to me a terribly high-profile story in the msm here in the US, so I feel its freshness hasn't altogether leached away ahead of the end-of-third-day horizon. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Kyiv Post was used for quotations. That’s it. Which was present in other sources too. But since Gryllida corrected the translation, it doesn’t matter.
acagastya PING ME! 12:54, 3 October 2017 (UTC)