Talk:US Supreme Court overturns fraud convictions in Kelly v. United States

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Notes[edit]

  • The summary of the bridgegate scandal added in Special:Diff/4563437 comes from the opinion, which is in the public domain, and thus is not a copyright violation

--DannyS712 (talk) 22:00, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Lede[edit]

@DannyS712: Just atm, there's nothing in the lede that clues in an international audience to what this case is about. It says "the Bridgegate scandal", which means nothing to an international audience, and "fraud", which could be almost anything. A very few words are needed, not a detailed explanation —it's the lede— but those few words have to get across to an international audience what all the fuss is about. --Pi zero (talk) 22:27, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

I clarified that the scandal was relating to traffic chaos; the articles and opinion just say fraud --DannyS712 (talk) 22:30, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
I'm available on IRC if you have questions --DannyS712 (talk) 22:31, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Review of revision 4563551 [Passed][edit]

Image?[edit]

Just wondering if anyone is willing to sight the edit. @Acagastya, Green Giant, Gryllida:. --Pi zero (talk) 13:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Done --Green Giant (talk) 13:22, 9 May 2020 (UTC)