User talk:Deckdeck21
|
Welcome to Wikinews
|
Getting started as a contributor
|
|
Welcome! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have an essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally.  | |
|
All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours.
Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere. The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing. Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly. |
The core policies
|
|
Places to go, people to meet
Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion. There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project. |
Find help and get involved
|
|
Write your first article for Wikinews!
Use the following box to help you create your first article. Simply type in a title to your story and press "Create page". Then start typing text to your story into the new box that will come up. When you're done, press "save page". That's all there is to it!
|
-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 00:25, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Welcome![edit]
It appears you are a student at the University of Wollongong. The {{UoW student}} template goes on your userpage. Just copy and paste the code below and fill in the information. —Mikemoral♪♫ 08:13, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
{{UoW student
|year=
|semester=
|course=
}}
Hi, after reading SMH links compiled to circumvent pending pay wall I would be rather interested to know whether you're an UoW student as well? Please take a closer look at what Mikemoral suggested or ask a question by clicking "Edit" at the right of this section, typing your question at the bottom, adding four tildes, and saving the page. Thanks and, at the risk of repeating, welcome to Wikinews. :) --Gryllida 09:43, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Your SMH article review status[edit]
I reviewed it and left detailed review comments. Cheers. --Gryllida 10:13, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Found not ready. Great to see OR undertaken. I've tried to provide extensive help about OR notes in my Review comments. Just a few edits during review. --Pi zero (talk) 11:17, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oh dear. I've very sorry about this. There's been a horrible screw-up with this article. Honestly, in my years on Wikinews I don't think I've ever seen such a mess. I'm not even sure what the path forward from here can be, but we'll try to sort it out, and keep you posted. --Pi zero (talk) 12:37, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
I wasn't sure how to make this known to you earlier, sorry. Completely confused as to why that lede was written and published. I updated the story this morning in light of the most recent developments hoping it wouldn't go stale. Apologies if I interfered in the review process. Please let me know if there's anything I need to do. --Deckdeck21
- No, your edits seem to have been safely before review started, so I don't think anything you did interfered with the review. Mistakes were made during the review, and things didn't work the way they should have. I suppose I should be blaming the reviewer, except that with all the time I spend on review, I have great sympathy for just how difficult review is. We're trying to build tools to make both writing and reviewing easier, in our copious free time (it comes on top of the actual labor of writing-and-review).
- To raise the alarm about something like this, I'd suggest a note on the article talk page, a note on one of the water coolers, and perhaps notes on some reviewers' user talk pages, certainly starting with the publishing reviewer's. --Pi zero (talk) 13:31, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Noted for next time. Thank you. Is it likely that the story is going to be re-reviewed and published? I can only imagine how long it takes to review an article - I don't want either of our hard work to go to waste! Please let me know! --Deckdeck21
- Went I went to bed last night, there were two articles on the review queue; I fell asleep wondering if there was any way I could process both of those in the morning and then sort out this one. I get up this morning and there are six article son the queue. I've noticed this, over time, about review supply and demand: however much review labor we have available at a given time, demand for review always increases to exceed supply. We'll see what happens. --Pi zero (talk) 11:22, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your contribution[edit]
Hello. Your article "Australian Security Intelligence Organisation website hacked, blueprints stolen" has been deemed abandoned, but is still viewable at User:Deckdeck21/Australian Security Intelligence Organisation website hacked, blueprints stolen. Thank you for your contribution. Remember that most articles from new contributors are not published and so there is no need to be discouraged. Just read Wikinews:Writing an article and follow the guidelines there and your next article will likely be published. Thanks again for your interest.--William S. Saturn (talk) 01:33, 16 June 2013 (UTC)