Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Pi zero

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.

User promoted per consensus, congrats. Tempodivalse [talk] 17:40, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pi zero (talk · contribs)

I've had in mind for the past several weeks that I would request adminship here; I believe that my ability to help out here would be enhanced. Admittedly, if left entirely to my own devices I would probably have waited another month or even two, due to real-world demands on my time. It has been demonstrated to me recently, though, that there are occasions when participation here becomes important enough to me that I will find time for it — and then BRS nominated me for ArbCom. It seems reasonable to move up my schedule for RFA in light of that nomination. (I do have some limited experience with adminship, by the way, as I was granted it at Wikibooks about a month ago. No, I didn't request there, either; I just didn't choose to turn down the nomination.) --Pi zero (talk) 20:06, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Votes

Strong Support. Great to have you. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 20:12, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I thought you were already. — μ 20:14, July 10 2010 (UTC)
Support Level-headed user, smart, great administrator material. Tempodivalse [talk] 20:17, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely. —fetch·comms 00:34, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Has clue. I honestly thought you were one already. the wub "?!" 10:15, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, and, to corrupt the wub's supporting comment, has clue, groks Wikinews. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 10:20, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per l'Wub. Diego Grez ^{return fire} 14:48, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bawolff ☺☻ 20:40, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Benny the mascot (talk) 12:56, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tyrol5 (talk) 14:30, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per μ. —Mike moral ♪♫ 04:26, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per 'the wub'. Pi zero would be a great administator. --Nascar 1996 04:30, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support It would be kind of nice to have a non-admin candidate for ArbCom. Nevertheless, Pi zero will make a good admin, even if busy in real life for a couple of months. --InfantGorilla (talk) 08:09, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Someone close this up Tyrol5 (talk) 15:14, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's a bit early at the moment, usually we let requests for adminship run at least a full week before closing to give everyone a chance to voice possible concerns. I don't think we need to rush atm. Tempodivalse [talk] 15:20, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, I wasn't thinking at the moment. I now realize that. Tyrol5 (talk) 15:21, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support without a doubt. And to think you were going to close this. :P --Thunderhead ^{(t - e - c)} 16:39, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Popping over to Support - I think he's a very good editor, not only here, but at WB as well, where he's an admin. Kayau (talk · contribs) 05:30, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.