Wikinews:Bots
|
|
Please read the policy before making a request for bot permission. See also Wikinews:Global bots.
I | Create a user account (while logged in to your normal account) and a user page for the bot
On the bot userpage, add the {{TestBot}} template, which automatically adds the page to Category:Test bots. Then add the following mandatory information to the bot userpage:
|
---|---|
II | Create your bot request:
Add your bot request at the foot of the list here:
|
III | Test run
You could be asked to make a short test run with your bot account (10–20 edits usually) to allow other users to review your bot's tasks. Unauthorized test runs are not allowed. |
IV | Waiting for approval.
You now need to wait for community approval. The request must remain open for at least two weeks. A bureaucrat will close the request and will also grant a bot flag, where necessary. You can then change the {{TestBot}} template to a {{Bot}} on the bot userpage. Closed requests are moved to Wikinews:Bots/Archive. |
Requests
[edit]Operator: Leaderboard
Bot tasks for which permission is being sought: meta:Global reminder bot
Automatic or manually assisted: Automatic
Edit type: Daily in theory. However, I think the bot will almost never run on this wiki; however, I'm told that it is still good practice to request approval.
Maximum edit rate (e.g. edits per minute): Maybe once per month at most?
Bot flag requested: (Y/N): N
Programming language(s): Python
Leaderboard (talk) 08:19, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]- @Gryllida: is this something you could take a look at? Leaderboard (talk) 14:15, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- On a small wiki I am worried this could be unnecessary as users would make token edits just to keep the access. Is there some evidence that notification, for example if done manually somewhere, improved things and re-engaged the contributor in editing regularly? Gryllida (talk) 13:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Gryllida Firstly, this only applies to temporary rights (i.e when you assign a right for a certain period) - it's not going to remind anyone whose rights are technically indefinite (i.e, it does not affect WN:PEP). This bot was launched only in August, so hard evidence is difficult to find; however, this bot was inspired by a case where a user with global rights was unable to help their community because they did not realise that their rights had expired. For a wiki like this (like most small wikis), it is expected to almost never post anything - so it will simply run silently. Does this answer your question? Leaderboard (talk) 13:05, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes thanks. Then maybe it is not needed here as no privileges expire automatically. I welcome someone pointing out a different point of view, I am rather neutral on this. Gryllida (talk) 13:12, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Gryllida Firstly, this only applies to temporary rights (i.e when you assign a right for a certain period) - it's not going to remind anyone whose rights are technically indefinite (i.e, it does not affect WN:PEP). This bot was launched only in August, so hard evidence is difficult to find; however, this bot was inspired by a case where a user with global rights was unable to help their community because they did not realise that their rights had expired. For a wiki like this (like most small wikis), it is expected to almost never post anything - so it will simply run silently. Does this answer your question? Leaderboard (talk) 13:05, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- On a small wiki I am worried this could be unnecessary as users would make token edits just to keep the access. Is there some evidence that notification, for example if done manually somewhere, improved things and re-engaged the contributor in editing regularly? Gryllida (talk) 13:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Votes
[edit]Current bots
[edit]
|
See also Category:Former bots. |