Wikinews talk:Briefs/February 8, 2014

I took the article off the review queue, because minimum size requirement is 3 paragraphs and the first paragraph doesn't answer the basic questions. It still doesn't, I don't know where the session happened. --Gryllida 06:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

I gather there was some confusion surrounding this article. It's meant to be a Shorts article, but there are formatting problems; I'm writing some review comments now. --Pi zero (talk) 12:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Review of revision 2383679 [Not ready]

Revision 2383679 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 12:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: Please see other recent Shorts articles for examples of the format needed; such as UK Wikinews Shorts: July 8, 2013. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 2383679 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 12:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: Please see other recent Shorts articles for examples of the format needed; such as UK Wikinews Shorts: July 8, 2013. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Please move

Please move this into space of User:Charmayne18 Crtew (talk) 21:23, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Done (was in fact already scheduled for about now). --Pi zero (talk) 21:36, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Why was this un-userspaced? It was userspaced because it was an abandoned one written by a USI student. Heavy Water (talk) 17:46, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

I was going to delete it originally. At the time I was also trying to get the Briefs and Shorts organised (see the list on WN:Briefs), in an attempt to see if they could be revived as an ancillary project. There are quite a few that were never published but were just left to linger. As you can see from the list, there are far more red links than blue. I decided against trying revival any further, after we adopted the hundred-word minimum limit. [₂₄Cr][talk] 18:18, 6 June 2024 (UTC)