Wikinews:Deletion requests

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
(Redirected from Wikinews:RFD)
Jump to: navigation, search
WN:DR redirects here. For dispute resolution, see WN:DISPUTE.

This page seeks to resolve the question whether a page or file should be deleted through consensus.

Articles that are from other news sources, abandoned, minimal, or press releases are generally dealt with by proposed deletion processes and need not be listed here individually.

Listings appear for a minimum of seven days but may be left longer to allow sufficient discussion. After the appropriate period, an administrator looks at the page or file and determines whether consensus for deletion has been reached. If it has, the page is deleted. The period of time starts at the submission of the deletion request on this page.

You may also list tag pages for speedy deletion page by adding {{delete|reason}} to the page to be nominated for speedy deletion.

  • Read and be familiar with the Criteria for deletion before listing a page here, or debating on a page here. Please vote using {{keep}}, {{remove}}, {{neutral}}, or {{comment}} followed by signature.
  • Articles must fall foul of the Criteria for deletion to be listed here. Invalid listings will be removed. Editors may not edit the Criteria for deletion in order to justify their listing.
  • Note: If you have registered an account at Wikinews for the sole purpose of attempting to sway a deletion request, any vote and comment within the voting section will be struck and disregarded.

This page is also the proper venue for discussing undeletion requests. If you object to speedy deletion of an article, or wish to overturn another deletion request, please list it here. An admin may undelete it at their discretion for the duration of the vote, so that users may view the item they are voting on.

How to list a page here[edit]

  1. Add {{Deletion request}} or {{dr}} to the image, category or article page.
    • For suspected copyright violations, instead add {{Copyvio|url=insert_web_address_here}}. The page will be deleted after one day according to the proposed deletion policy.
    • For abandoned articles, instead add {{subst:aband}} to the top of the page, but please be aware that people often forget to request {{review}}. Articles are considered abandoned if after four days no edits were made. Such articles are deleted two days later.
  2. List the link below using the following template:
== Date of nomination ==
=== [[Article title]] ===
State reason for deletion request and sign (--~~~~).
==== Comments ====

==== Votes ====

Note for admins[edit]

To close a Deletion Request, enclose the DR with:

and then delete the article if the DR was successful or remove {{DR}} from the article if it was kept.
  • If the subject of a deletion was a category/image/template and the DR was successful, the closing admin should remove those from the pages on which they appear.
  • The talk page of the article can be updated by adding {{Multidel}} with a Diff to the closed DR discussion to the top of the talk page.


Deletion requests[edit]

March 17, 2018[edit]

Files uploaded by AZOperator (t · c · b) for use in US: Judge enters 'not guilty' for Florida school shooting suspect, audio/video forced release with FBI timeline[edit]

  1. File:Nikolas Cruz campus movements.png
  2. File:Suspect Movement in Building 12.png

It is my opinion, these images do not qualify for a fair use exception with regards to reusing copyrighted images. The uploader has stated they were found on Commons, however, if they were there, I cannot locate them now. The aspect of the story they are used to illustrate is by no means 'breaking news' furthermore it would be easy to create free versions by anyone with a graphics program, a free satellite photo, and a few hours of spare time.

As best as I can determine, the images are the work of the Sun-Sentinel as seen in this article.

Thank you for your time, --SVTCobra 19:26, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Comments[edit]

Hello SVTCobra. "a few hours of spare time" is a wonderful description of one of the resources that journalistic work requires. :-) Concur that the images may be reproduced by hand to convey the same information (or even more) in a free way. --Gryllida (talk) 02:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Votes[edit]

  • Remove as argued. Article works well without these images and shouldn't contain non-free images. --Gwyndon (talk) 02:33, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Remove per my own nomination. --SVTCobra 14:09, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Remove per nomination and because the article has been deleted. Green Giant (talk) 22:05, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

January 28, 2018[edit]

Files uploaded by Bidgee (t · c · b) claiming "fair use" listed below[edit]

  1. File:Malik flash quotes.png
  2. File:Athletics - Women's Shot Put - F53 Final - Start List.pdf
  3. File:Karamjyoti vs. UOI (1).pdf
  4. File:Profile on Paralympic Site.png
  5. File:Results online for Malik.png
  6. File:Athletics - Women's Shot Put - F53 Final - Start List.pdf

All of these files are only used on Talk:Wikinews interviews India's first female Paralympic medalist Deepa Malik serving what purpose I can only speculate as "notes".

None of them have any sort of fair-use rationale. Furthermore, I cannot even imagine justifying this. They appear to be screenshots (mostly) of web pages. Those pages should have been listed in the sources and not screenshotted in lieu of proper OR notes.

These are all high-resolution images, which serve no newsworthy purpose, and in my opinion should be deleted posthaste. Cheers, --SVTCobra 22:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Comments[edit]

  • Regarding @Mikemoral:'s comment in his vote, might I suggest we store any of the ones needed for OR notes wherever we store things that get submitted to @scoop? Cheers, --SVTCobra 03:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
    • Afaik scoop data is only stored in scoop inbox (which also means all accredited reporters inboxes also). There is a journalists private wiki where the data could also be stored but i do not remember being asked to do this. Of course people could do that by their own initiative if they wanted. Gryllida (talk) 19:00, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
      • I agree, scoop isn't archived. I had some old OR stuff archived on a laptop that died a few years ago, so that's gone too. Stuff happens.

        Are deleted files kept in the wiki database indefinitely? --Pi zero (talk) 19:18, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

        • I just tried to restore a couple of files that were deleted in 2005 and got the following message: Internal error: [WrXAFwpAMFYAAGassj4AAAAG] 2018-03-24 03:03:51: Fatal exception of type "LogicException" So I guess not. --SVTCobra 03:10, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
          • Interesting. (That pinged me, btw.) --Pi zero (talk) 03:20, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
            • @SVTCobra, Pi zero: Deleted Wikimedia files have only been restorable from June 2006 onwards. That's probably why you wouldn't be able to restore older ones. See this announcement for more details. Green Giant (talk) 22:01, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Votes[edit]

  • Delete: These probably are violating copyright, but we should however transcribe any relevant information to the talk page as reporting notes. —mikemoral (talk · contribs) 09:14, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete: Supporting Mikemoral in preserving the contents but deleting the screenshots. --Gwyndon (talk) 02:31, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Remove Per SVTCobra. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 02:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Remove but store off-wiki. --SVTCobra 14:11, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

January 8, 2018[edit]


January 3, 2018[edit]


December 30, 2017[edit]


Proposed deletions[edit]

 Purge server cache  For reference, it is currently May 23, 2018.

Copyvio[edit]

Delete articles in this category posted before May 22.

Abandoned[edit]

Delete articles in this category posted before May 21.

Minimal and PR[edit]

Delete articles in these categories posted before May 20.


Unsourced prepared[edit]

Delete articles in this category posted before May 13


Undeletion requests[edit]