Wikinews:Requests for permissions/CheckUser/Green Giant

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Closing this a passed with 25/25 votes -- a cent per cent record, congratulations, @Green Giant:.
•–• 04:04, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Green Giant (talk · contribs) — Checkuser

I would also like to nominate Green Giant for CU privs. Green Giant is the most active admin who has been looking after the many various activities which require the mop-and-the-bucket. Green Giant has been a steward, a sysop and a reviewer for many years now, and knows ins and outs of CUing and dealing with the (LT) abusers. In the recent days and weeks, with the increasing spam and abuse received on-enwn, I have been creating various AFs, and requesting CUs by stewards on meta; though Green Giant can't do it, because stews can't CU on projects they are active on. It is a shame we cannot (until now) utilise help of someone who is one of the most competent Wikimedians to deal with this thing, and granting them this privs will really help save too much of friction that happens making CU request on meta, back and forth, and deal with things quickly, and minimise the time lost behind that. I would urge you to support this nomination. Cheers!
•–• 14:27, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Green Giant: do you accept the nomination?
•–• 14:27, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes and thank you for the nomination. -Green Giant (talk) 14:46, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stats

Links for Green Giant: Green Giant (talk · contribs · deleted · count · logs · block log · review log · lu)

Questions and comments

You may or may not have stats or numbers, and I do not expect high accuracy for your answer, but can you estimate how much vandalism exists in Wikinews which requires Checkuser tools to manage? Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:06, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bluerasberry: I don’t have stats on vandalism to hand but the largest proportion needing Checkuser attention is spam. A good indicator would be the 75-80 new accounts blocked by the Abuse Filter over the last seven days or so. Also there is a list of earlier accounts which I dealt with a few days ago through loginwiki. --Green Giant (talk) 15:36, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Strong support as the nominator (see nomination for rationale).
•–• 14:27, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support but you may be forced to go for sitenotice given the difficulty of getting the voters you need (though it's not without precedent here). Leaderboard (talk) 18:15, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -RockerballAustralia contribs 06:51, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Many thanks. Gryllida (talk) 19:48, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support —chaetodipus (talk · contribs) 02:51, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Strong and demonstrated commitment to the Wikimedia project. --JJLiu112 (talk) 04:11, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support No hesitation from me, both two great candidates. --LivelyRatification (talk) 07:34, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Seem plez 08:00, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Go for it! Phearson (talk) 09:55, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Esteban (talk) 10:37, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 13:05, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support: trusted user and long-time person keeping this afloat. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:31, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Bddpaux (talk) 15:40, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support —AlvaroMolina (✉ - ✔) 15:46, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ShakataGaNai ^{^_^} 16:49, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --William S. Saturn (talk) 19:59, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support See my message on Acagastya's nomination. ICameHereForNews (talk) 21:05, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wikiwide (talk) 00:04, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — While I'm leery of checkuser permissions for obvious reasons, it has always been - and remains - a necessary evil. — Gopher65_talk 02:57, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Patrick M (TUFKAAP) (talk) 03:05, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support This user has a history of thoughtful on-wiki contributions and meta-wiki policy proposals. Through all of this I have seen this user to be good at managing large conversations and open discussion. With thousands of Wikinews contributions, admin rights here, much more cross-wiki experience, and my personal observations on how they manage discussion, I support this user's rights request. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:05, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 09:54, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 12:35, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Xbspiro (talk) 04:16, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support experienced user Edu! (talk) 20:34, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.